Committee on Science and Technology
Click to view Printer-Friendly formatted page. Printer-Friendly  |  Font Size: A A A
Popular Tags:: NASA:  

Press Releases :: September 27, 2010

Chairman Gordon Statement on House Consideration of NASA Reauthorization

 

(Washington, DC) – Today, Committee on Science and Technology Chairman Bart Gordon (D-TN) offered the following statement:
 
“I anticipate that the House will consider the Senate version of the NASA reauthorization on Wednesday.  I still believe that the bipartisan Compromise language we released is a better approach.  I have a number of concerns with the Senate bill, including: 
·         The Senate bill includes an unfunded mandate to keep the Shuttle program going through the remainder of FY 2011, even after the Shuttle is retired, at a cost of $500 million or more without clarifying where the funds will come from, all but ensuring that other important NASA programs will be cannibalized.
·         I am concerned that the Senate bill is overly prescriptive for the design of the follow-on rocket.  The end result is the Senate trying to design a rocket for NASA, while being silent on the safety of the vehicle.  The compromise language lets NASA determine the best approach in the design of the follow-on human spaceflight and exploration program. 
·         The compromise language ensures access to the ISS and minimizes the human spaceflight transportation ‘gap’ that will exist after the Shuttle is retired.  The Senate bill does not provide a timetable for a government backup capability, which could make NASA’s access to space completely dependent on commercial providers.  I am hopeful the commercial providers will be successful, but, whereas they have missed contractual cargo milestones thus far, I am wary of being completely dependent on them, because if they fail, we will be dependent on the Russians for longer than absolutely necessary.
 
It has become clear that there is not time remaining to pass a Compromise bill through the House and the Senate.  For the sake of providing certainty, stability, and clarity to the NASA workforce and larger space community, I felt it was better to consider a flawed bill than no bill at all as the new fiscal year begins.  I will continue to advocate to the Appropriators for the provisions in the Compromise language.”
 
For more information including on the Committee’s work on NASA, please visit our website.
 
###
111.234

 


News from the House Science and Technology Committee
2321 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515
tel: (202) 225-6375 | fax: (202) 225-3895
SciTech@mail.house.gov | Contact us Online

Bart Gordon, Chairman
http://science.house.gov/

 

Subcommittee Quick Links
[technology]  [energy]  [oversight]  [research]  [space]

technology and innovation

energy and environment

Investigations and Oversight

research and science education

space and aeronautics

The 112TH CONGRESS (2011-2012) The Library of Congress: THOMAS



 

Science Education and You

CMF Platinum Mouse Award for the 111th Congress
Last Updated